
Teacher Evaluations Based on Student Performance
Wall Street Journal article discusses new teacher evaluation methods and how the results will be used for incentives.
This post is also available in: Spanish
Following up on the article we shared last week on the value-added approach to teacher evaluation in Washington, DC, a recent New York Times article, along with a column by Nicholas Kristof, report on a new study that examines whether the value-added approach effectively distinguishes between good and bad teachers, and how much impact those teachers have on students.
After tracking 1 million students over 20 years, the authors concluded that 1) value-added approaches accurately measure teacher quality over time, and 2) students of teachers with high value-added scores were subsequently more successful in many dimensions, including attending college, earning higher salaries, and avoiding teenage pregnancy.
In the words of one of the co-authors, John N. Friedman of Harvard University: “If you leave a low value-added teacher in your school for 10 years, rather than replacing him with an average teacher, you are hypothetically talking about $2.5 million in lost income.”Kristof concludes that “The obvious policy solution is more pay for good teachers, more dismissals for weak teachers.”
Use the value-added tag to access previous PREAL analyses of value-added ratings.
Wall Street Journal article discusses new teacher evaluation methods and how the results will be used for incentives.
New York Times article discusses new initiative by Gates Foundation to fund research on improving teacher performance evaluation.
New York Times Magazine article explores the debate and history of teacher effectiveness in the US.